Author Archives: Todd Weed

About Todd Weed

I want to get along.

Patterns and textures

These patterns were originally for Nautilus, the GNOME file manager (now called “Files”), when it supported having images as backgrounds. They are still good for some other programs though so I touched them up a bit.

I designed these so readability was good with them which was the key factor. A background I feel is to help with the comfort-ability of the area. They are barely noticed and add grip to the area. An original example:


And here is a view of them all:



Firefox profile on a flash drive


I regularly use a computer at my workplace. This computer multiple people use so it is setup not to save Firefox’s settings. I use it enough, in specific ways, that I decided to find a way to use it with settings available.

I take a flash drive with me to be able to access various personal documents and programs. I had heard about web browsers being installed on flash drives; after I thought about it awhile, I realized all I would be required to do is put a profile on it.

The flash drive I have is formatted FAT32 to be able to use with Windows (my work computer) and I keep my flash drive organized similar to my Linux home directory for convenience. First I created a directory for the profile:

mkdir -p ~/.mozilla/firefox/profile/ANAME

Then I create the profile—from the command prompt this command will get the job done:

start firefox.exe -CreateProfile "MyName D:\.mozilla\firefox\profile\ANAME"


(Or alternately I could have typed firefox.exe -P from the start menu and used the GUI version.)

I started the profile then to have the necessary files created. After it got done loading, I quit Firefox and I deleted the profile managers knowledge of the profile but not the profile itself (see example picture).

With the profile created all required effort left to be done is to instruct Firefox of the profile’s location. I put this in a batch script so that I can regularly use it:

@echo off


set HOMEDRIVE=%cd:~0,2%

if exist C:\PATH\TO\firefox.exe start /b C:\PATH\TO\firefox.exe -profile %HOMEDRIVE%\.mozilla\firefox\profile\toddweed && exit

if exist C:\PATH\TO\firefox.exe start /b C:\PATH\TO\firefox.exe -profile %HOMEDRIVE%\.mozilla\firefox\profile\toddweed && exit

if exist C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe (
  start /b C:\PATH\TO\firefox.exe -profile %HOMEDRIVE%\.mozilla\firefox\profile\toddweed
) else (
  echo Firefox executable not found.

GNU love for Windows


I wanted to be able to type in Windows with a familiar text editor. I downloaded a terminal text editor called gvim, which I think is a good text editor, and it was able to be installed portably—this last is necessary as the computer I use I am not able to install anything on. However, even with having that, I discovered that I wanted to be to use the GNU tools I had become familiar with… hence a dilemma.

There are several projects that provide GNU utilities on Windows… I have learned. I am not an expert in these mind you—I have tried only one—however, I’ve heard good things about them all. The following are all terminal emulators and they include the GNU utilities: Cygwin, Gow (GNU on Windows), and Git-bash.

I have only tried the later one. The reason for this is because I’ve had it already installed as it comes installed with the Git program that I use at times. I would have like to tried for the first two, however I’m not too picky and Git-bash has done me well enough; it has the basic utilities and is pretty much ready to go.

Having GNU utilities available is handy for me and saves me a bit of time because of familiarity; another bonus is time saved that would be required to learn the Windows command line. The tools run just like they do on Linux/Unix and can be used on the whole file system. Many of the tools are there: sed, awk, mkdir…. For example, I can type:

$ find /c/Windows/Web/ -type f -name "*Think*"

By default the terminal emulator uses the already set Windows %HOMEPATH% variable for shell’s $HOME directory—this is usually C:\Users\USERNAME. I decided to use my flash drive as the $HOME directory where all my documents and settings could be kept. I had to create a batch script that defined the %HOMEPATH% and then have it start Git-bash:

@echo off

set HOMEDRIVE=%cd:~0,2%

start /B %HOMEDRIVE%\Downloads\Git\git-bash.exe


I then created a shortcut to flash drive root directory for quick access and to have a custom icon. I icon I choose was taken from the git-bash.exe file when I was asked for the icon location.

Git setup

An error was the first thing I had to fix… and it may just be for my particular version of Git; it complained to me when I tried to use it and I had to specify the certificate location. I did this by:

git config --system http.sslcainfo /d/Downloads/Git/mingw32/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt

After this I added ssh-agent to my ~/.bashrc launch it:

# SSH agent auto-launch
# 0 = agent running with key; 1 = agent running w/o key; 2 = agent not running
agent_run_state=$(ssh-add -l >| /dev/null 2>&1; echo $?)
if   [ $agent_run_state = 2 ]; then
  eval $(ssh-agent -s)
elif [ $agent_run_state = 1 ]; then

And likewise I added to the bash_logout file ssh-agent -k as Windows would think that it was still running if I didn’t.

Now I’m working pretty good in Windows.

lnk—forward thinking file linking

When I first used ln I tried using it before reading the documentation. I had assumed that linking was a basic enough operation to make the syntax ln [source-target] [linkname] all I needed to do. I learned though the common deployment of ln is otherwise. Since I created enough links, and because I felt the syntax should be basic, I created a script to get this behavior.

Besides a basic syntax that was logical to me, there are a few other reasons why I created the script. To know what they are, it helps to know the basics of linking.

Principalia linkathica

The default/non-optioned use of ln creates a hard link. A “hard link” is essentially just another name for an existing file. Because the hard link and its source (“target” in the documentation’s wording) share the same file system inode, they are almost indistinguishable (the inode contains all the information about a file).

Hard links are rarely used however. For several reasons its alternative a symbolic link is. While the ln default behavior does create a hard link, its existence is likely a inherited artifact—hard links came before symbolic links and program syntax had to be maintained to run as the users expected.

A symbolic link is more versatile than a hard link. It is sometimes referred to as a “symlink” or a “soft link” and it has some advantages. It can be:

  • readily used on directories
  • used across file system boundaries
  • created if the source/target doesn’t exist
  • color formatted with the ls command (and often is by default)

Further explanation of what a symbolic link is (as explained in the ln Info page, lightly paraphrased):

A symbolic link is a special type of file that refers to a different file by name. Most operations that are passed to the link file (opening, reading, writing…) are deferred by the kernel to operate on its target. Some operations (e.g. removing) work on the link file itself. The owner and group of a symlink have no effect on the file access of the target — they only have an effect on the removing of the symlink itself. On the GNU system, the file mode bits of a symlink have no significance and cannot be changed.

A symlink can be defined either with absolute or relative paths, the later being commonly used on removable media.


cd $HOME
touch  file.txt
ln                 file.txt  file_hrdlink.txt
ln -s  /home/$USER/file.txt  /home/$USER/file_symlink-absolute.txt
ln -s     ../$USER/file.txt  file_symlink-relative.txt
ln -s     ../$USER/FILE.txt  file_symlink-relativebroken.txt

“Dance with the one that brung ya”

A basic syntax was what I wanted to be able to link by and why I created the script, additionally, a couple more benefits were able to be added:

  • symbolic links used by default as they are more flexible
  • absolute paths used for consistency and because they are usually more inductive to resolve
  • existence tests used on the source target and destination directory


lnk [source-target] [directory-or-linkname] — a generic linker


lnk can be found in my general-scripts repository.

Keyboard outlines for key mapping

When I work with a program long enough I will at times like to write down the key mappings so I may refer to them later. I had done this enough that I decided I might as well make a keyboard outline to use for key mapping. I did four of them for the basic US-English models. The fonts Arial and Arial MT Rounded are required to see properly. Enjoy.

Compact layout

Full layout

Laptop layout

Mini layout

Example key mapping

Root directory residuals

root-directory-residualsThe only directory in my file system that I’d like to keep track of is my home directory. Here I keep my personal files and the a number of configurations that I love. I write notes of any configuration edits I make and record them here. However, besides the system configurations that I have edited, I also have a few more root directory configurations that I created. I wanted a way to keep track of them.

Getting down with the O C D

Previously I choose to reinstall about every six to twelve months. This allowed me to examine the install process to see if there were any new details about the operating system that I needed to learn. However, doing this procedure caused me to lose some good details I had put in the configurations. After I did this a few times, I began to do backups of them.

To keep the system running as expected, I learned I had to keep track of my configurations. The system configurations that I had edited originally I could keep track of by package updates (where I have to regularly merge the new versions to the old). However for the system configurations I created, I pretty much forgot them. These files occasionally I would rediscover when I had to do some troubleshooting. I came to the conclusion that if I wanted to track them, the best way to do so was to put them in a package`.

(I choose now to avoid installs when I can. These days, researching the install guide is enough to keep me up-to-date of operating system changes.)

Hunter and gatherer

I wasn’t always good at recording what configurations I created — I would test something out, or get excited when an experiment worked… Therefore, I had to search through the file system to re-track these files. This involved me making a list of all the files in the file system and comparing that to a list of files of the packages themselves. This sounds like a laborious process but isn’t terribly difficult and can be trimmed down greatly.

Because configurations are generally only in several directories less searching is required.

A file list of all packages, can be created with:

for p in $(pacman -Qq); do pacman -Qql $p; done | sed 's#/$##g' | sort -u -o pkgs-filelist.txt

A file list of the root directory, can be created with:

find / -not -path "/dev/*" -not -path "/home/*" -not -path "/media/*" -not -path "/mnt/*" -not -path "/proc/*" -not -path "/root/*" -not -path "/run/*" -not -path "/srv/*" -not -path "/sys/*" -not -path "/tmp/*" -not -path "/var/cache/*"  -not -path "/var/lib/pacman/*" -not -path "/var/lib/systemd/*" -not -path "/var/log/journal/*" -not -path "/var/tmp/*" | sed 's#/$##g' | sort -u -o root-filelist.txt

The differences can be viewed with:

vimdiff pkgs-filelist.txt root-filelist.txt

The package please… emmhh!

Creating a configuration package is the same as creating any other package. I put the configurations in the PKGBUILD directory and in it directed where to install them. In the future if an edit is required, I edit them there and rebuild it.


Command line dictionary


As a person who likes to write it has always been helpful for me to have a dictionary nearby. As a regular command line user to have a dictionary I could access from there was something I really wanted. I hadn’t predicted this would be much of a task, however, I found it an uphill battle.

What I felt a command line dictionary should offer:

1) a basic description that is accurate
2) the capability to be accessed offline
3) a formatting that is easy to read


In my original attempt I didn’t find any. I looked at a number of programs but most were inadequate in one way or another. I was baffled and I almost gave up looking. I did eventually find one but before that the two most promising programs were dictd and sdcv.


Dictd is a protocol/software-framework for a networking dictionary, it contains both a server and a client. The idea is to have a server where numerous clients can connect to it. This would be useful for local network use or for something like an online dictionary group. However, it seems that the development has been quiet, and I had trouble installing several of its dictionaries… I could never get it to work.

The basic setup steps that are required to make it function are:

  1. install package and a dictionary for it
  2. start the dictd daemon (requires very little overhead) and check if the dictionaries are available (dict -I).
  3. look up a word definition using a particular dictionary (e.g. dict --database gcide)


I used to use this program (Stardict console version) for years. It provided a basic, easy-to-use, unambiguous, definition. These days, however, the parent program StarDict is no longer in development. Additionaly, there were formatting problems that broke reading flow, and made it difficult to read.

Forest through the trees

I may not always get what I want, at other times, if I’m paying attention, I’ll find what I need. I discovered a program that while not a full-blown dictionary does pretty good. It technically might not even be a dictionary. From the man page:

wn - command line interface to the WordNet lexical database... it outputs synsets and relations to be displayed as formatted text.

In more human-speak: it details relationships between words. Its use as a thesaurus would be of a more direct comparison; however it can work for a dictionary as it does provide definitions and contextual examples. The definitions may be basic, but they are to the point. The only feature it does not provide that I use sometimes is word pronunciations.

wn lexical -over
The adj lexical has 2 senses (first 1 from tagged texts)
1. (2) lexical -- (of or relating to words; "lexical decision task")
2. lexical -- (of or relating to dictionaries) 

Creating good enough alone

The output of wn can be difficult to read: it jumbles a lot of information together, and only roughly organizes it. (FYI, in the above example I’ve filtered out a couple lines.) To help the reading of it in a smooth natural way, I’ve created a couple scripts to format the output. One script is called dict and the other is called thes.


I’ve put them in a repository for any who are interested.